On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 07:47, Daniel Drake <dr...@endlessm.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > And if there is a meaningful way to make the kernel behave better, that would > obviously be of huge value too. > > Thanks > Daniel
Hi, Is there a way for an application to be told that there is a memory pressure situation? For example, say I do a "make -j32" and half way through the compile it hits a memory pressure situation. If make could have been told about it. It could give up on some of the parallel compiles, and instead proceed as if the user have typed "make -j4". It could then re-try the failed compile parts, that failed due to memory pressure. I know all applications won't be this clever, but providing a kernel API so that an application could do something about it, if the programmer of that application has thought about it. It could be similar with say, a hadoop application. If the hadoop process detects memory pressure, if could back off, and process the data more slowly and not try to do so much at the same time. The kernel could also detect which processes are contributing most to the memory pressure (trying to do mallocs) and give them less processor time, and instead ask all processes to release some memory, and those processes that understood the kernel API for that notification could actually do something about it. I have also found, for the desktop, one of the biggest pressures on the system is disk pressure. Accessing the disk causes the UI to be less responsive. For example, if I am in vim, and trying to type letters on the keyboard, whether some other application is using the disk or not should have no impact on my letter writing. Has anyone got any ideas with regards to what we can do about that? Kind Regards James
