From: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>
If the user specified --ns, the column to print the sort time stamp
wasn't wide enough to actually print the full nanoseconds.
Widen the time key column width when --ns is specified.
Before:
% perf record -a sleep 1
% perf report --sort time,overhead,symbol --stdio --ns
...
2.39% 187851.10000 [k] smp_call_function_single - -
1.53% 187851.10000 [k] intel_idle - -
0.59% 187851.10000 [.] __wcscmp_ifunc - -
0.33% 187851.10000 [.] 0000000000000000 - -
0.28% 187851.10000 [k] cpuidle_enter_state - -
After:
% perf report --sort time,overhead,symbol --stdio --ns
...
2.39% 187851.100000000 [k] smp_call_function_single - -
1.53% 187851.100000000 [k] intel_idle - -
0.59% 187851.100000000 [.] __wcscmp_ifunc - -
0.33% 187851.100000000 [.] 0000000000000000 - -
0.28% 187851.100000000 [k] cpuidle_enter_state - -
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190823210338.12360-2-a...@firstfloor.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/util/hist.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.c b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
index 8efbf58dc3d0..33702675073c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
@@ -193,7 +193,10 @@ void hists__calc_col_len(struct hists *hists, struct
hist_entry *h)
hists__new_col_len(hists, HISTC_MEM_LVL, 21 + 3);
hists__new_col_len(hists, HISTC_LOCAL_WEIGHT, 12);
hists__new_col_len(hists, HISTC_GLOBAL_WEIGHT, 12);
- hists__new_col_len(hists, HISTC_TIME, 12);
+ if (symbol_conf.nanosecs)
+ hists__new_col_len(hists, HISTC_TIME, 16);
+ else
+ hists__new_col_len(hists, HISTC_TIME, 12);
if (h->srcline) {
len = MAX(strlen(h->srcline), strlen(sort_srcline.se_header));
--
2.21.0
