On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 19:03 +0800, Jason Yan wrote:
>
> On 2019/8/28 12:54, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 06:07:54PM +0800, Jason Yan wrote:
> > > +/*
> > > + * To see if we need to relocate the kernel to a random offset
> > > + * void *dt_ptr - address of the device tree
> > > + * phys_addr_t size - size of the first memory block
> > > + */
> > > +notrace void __init kaslr_early_init(void *dt_ptr, phys_addr_t size)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned long tlb_virt;
> > > + phys_addr_t tlb_phys;
> > > + unsigned long offset;
> > > + unsigned long kernel_sz;
> > > +
> > > + kernel_sz = (unsigned long)_end - KERNELBASE;
> >
> > Why KERNELBASE and not kernstart_addr?
> >
>
> Did you mean kernstart_virt_addr? It should be kernstart_virt_addr.
Yes, kernstart_virt_addr. KERNELBASE will be incorrect if the kernel was
loaded at a nonzero physical address without CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START being
adjusted to match.
-Scott
