On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:08 PM Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:07 PM Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulni...@google.com> > wrote: > > > > So then Miguel should maybe split off a new branch, rebase to keep > > just the relevant patch > > (https://github.com/ojeda/linux/commit/c97e82b97f4bba00304905fe7965f923abd2d755), > > and send a PR to you for inclusion in 5.3? > > Yes. With the appropriate test cycle
Sedat reported the issue and already tested/verified the fix. How long should it sit in -next before sending a PR for inclusion to 5.3 (as opposed to letting it ride out to 5.4)? > , particularly obviously clang > (which I don't test in my own minor tests). It's the devil's compiler; wouldn't recommend. In all seriousness, I'm missing giving an update at LPC this year (have a much more important meeting: https://ironmaiden.com/tours/legacy-of-the-beast-tour-2019-2019/usa-oakland-ca-oracle-arena-2019-09-10), but I'm always happy to answer questions related to it or take a look at bug reports. Behan Webster is giving a talk about it at LPC though! Check it out if you're at LPC. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers