On 2019/9/13 15:31 robin <ro...@protonic.nl> wrote:>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On 2019-09-12 22:13, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Robin,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 06:23:29AM +0000, Robin van der Gracht wrote:
> >> The first generation i.MX6 processors does not send an interrupt when
> >> the power key is pressed. It sends a power down request interrupt if
> >> the key is released before a hard shutdown (5 second press). This
> >> should allow software to bring down the SoC safely.
> >>
> >> For this driver to work as a regular power key with the older SoCs,
> >> we need to send a keypress AND release when we get the power down
> >> request irq.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Robin van der Gracht <ro...@protonic.nl>
> >> ---
> >> @@ -67,13 +83,17 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_snvs_pwrkey_interrupt(int
> >> irq, void *dev_id) {
> >> struct platform_device *pdev = dev_id;
> >> struct pwrkey_drv_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >> + unsigned long expire = jiffies;
> >> u32 lp_status;
> >>
> >> pm_wakeup_event(pdata->input->dev.parent, 0);
> >>
> >> regmap_read(pdata->snvs, SNVS_LPSR_REG, &lp_status);
> >> - if (lp_status & SNVS_LPSR_SPO)
> >> - mod_timer(&pdata->check_timer, jiffies +
> >> msecs_to_jiffies(DEBOUNCE_TIME));
> >> + if (lp_status & SNVS_LPSR_SPO) {
> >> + if (pdata->minor_rev > 0)
> >> + expire = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(DEBOUNCE_TIME);
> >> + mod_timer(&pdata->check_timer, expire);
> >
> > Why do we even need to fire the timer in case of the first generation
> > hardware? Just send press and release events directly from the ISR.
That timer looks like a software debounce to prevent unexpected and
meaningless interrupt/event caused by quick press/release.
>
> Robin Gong proposed to move the code to imx_imx_snvs_check_for_events()
> to improve readability and unload the ISR.
>
> But since I, eventually, couldn't use the existing handling in
> imx_imx_snvs_check_for_events(), I do see why you're asking.
>
> I'll move the code to the ISR and submit a new patch.
>
> Robin van der Gracht
