On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 06:07:42PM -0600, Yu Zhao wrote: > The function doesn't need to return any value, and the check can be > done in one pass. > > There is a behavior change: before the patch, we stop at the first > invalid free object; after the patch, we stop at the first invalid > object, free or in use. This shouldn't matter because the original > behavior isn't intended anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuz...@google.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com> -- Kirill A. Shutemov
