On 9/15/19 8:52 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 9/15/19 1:25 PM, Helen Koike wrote:
>> Hi Shuah,
>>
>> On 9/6/19 11:42 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> Move duplicated IS_SRC and IS_SINK dfines to common header. Rename
>>> them to VIMC_IS_SRC and VIM_IS_SINK.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <sk...@linuxfoundation.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-common.h | 4 ++++
>>> drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-debayer.c | 11 ++++-------
>>> drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-scaler.c | 8 +++-----
>>> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-common.h
>>> b/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-common.h
>>> index 87ee84f78322..236412ad7548 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-common.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-common.h
>>> @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@
>>> #define VIMC_FRAME_INDEX(lin, col, width, bpp) ((lin * width + col) *
>>> bpp)
>>> +/* Source and sink pad checks */
>>> +#define VIMC_IS_SRC(pad) (pad)
>>> +#define VIMC_IS_SINK(pad) (!(pad))
>>
>> This is true now, but it might not be true in the future.
>> In the output video device (that was sent by André but not yet upstream) for
>> instance, only have a single
>> source pad (which I suppose the index will be 0), and this macro won't be
>> true.
>>
>
>> Maybe we could check pad flags in sd->entity->pads[index].flags ?
>>
>
> I think this change should be done in André's patch?
Could be yes, making it generic since the start would be nice,
but I don't mind updating this latter when needed.
Then:
Acked-by: Helen Koike <helen.ko...@collabora.com>
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
Thanks
Helen
