On 9/16/19 4:42 AM, Helen Koike wrote:
On 9/15/19 8:52 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 9/15/19 1:25 PM, Helen Koike wrote:
Hi Shuah,
On 9/6/19 11:42 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
Move duplicated IS_SRC and IS_SINK dfines to common header. Rename
them to VIMC_IS_SRC and VIM_IS_SINK.
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <sk...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-common.h | 4 ++++
drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-debayer.c | 11 ++++-------
drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-scaler.c | 8 +++-----
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-common.h
b/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-common.h
index 87ee84f78322..236412ad7548 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-common.h
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-common.h
@@ -27,6 +27,10 @@
#define VIMC_FRAME_INDEX(lin, col, width, bpp) ((lin * width + col) * bpp)
+/* Source and sink pad checks */
+#define VIMC_IS_SRC(pad) (pad)
+#define VIMC_IS_SINK(pad) (!(pad))
This is true now, but it might not be true in the future.
In the output video device (that was sent by André but not yet upstream) for
instance, only have a single
source pad (which I suppose the index will be 0), and this macro won't be true.
Maybe we could check pad flags in sd->entity->pads[index].flags ?
I think this change should be done in André's patch?
Could be yes, making it generic since the start would be nice,
but I don't mind updating this latter when needed.
Let's go with that then. This way we can get this series in and then
we can clean this up in André's patch.
Then:
Acked-by: Helen Koike <helen.ko...@collabora.com>
thanks,
-- Shuah
