On 20/09/2019 13:54, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>

Currently the zero check on val to break out of a loop
is a little obscure.  Replace the val is zero and break check
with a loop while value is non-zero.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
---
  drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt7601u/phy.c | 4 +---
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt7601u/phy.c 
b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt7601u/phy.c
index 06f5702ab4bd..4e0e473caae1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt7601u/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt7601u/phy.c
@@ -213,9 +213,7 @@ int mt7601u_wait_bbp_ready(struct mt7601u_dev *dev)
do {
                val = mt7601u_bbp_rr(dev, MT_BBP_REG_VERSION);
-               if (val && ~val)
-                       break;

AFAICS, this effectively implements "while (val == 0 || val == 0xff)", which is not at all equivalent to "while(val)"... :/

Robin.

-       } while (--i);
+       } while (val && --i);
if (!i) {
                dev_err(dev->dev, "Error: BBP is not ready\n");

Reply via email to