On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 04:03:55PM -0500, Steve Wahl wrote:
> Our hardware (UV aka Superdome Flex) has address ranges marked
> reserved by the BIOS. Access to these ranges is caught as an error,
> causing the BIOS to halt the system.
> 
> Initial page tables mapped a large range of physical addresses that
> were not checked against the list of BIOS reserved addresses, and
> sometimes included reserved addresses in part of the mapped range.
> Including the reserved range in the map allowed processor speculative
> accesses to the reserved range, triggering a BIOS halt.
> 
> Used early in booting, the page table level2_kernel_pgt addresses 1
> GiB divided into 2 MiB pages, and it was set up to linearly map a full
> 1 GiB of physical addresses that included the physical address range
> of the kernel image, as chosen by KASLR.  But this also included a
> large range of unused addresses on either side of the kernel image.
> And unlike the kernel image's physical address range, this extra
> mapped space was not checked against the BIOS tables of usable RAM
> addresses.  So there were times when the addresses chosen by KASLR
> would result in processor accessible mappings of BIOS reserved
> physical addresses.
> 
> The kernel code did not directly access any of this extra mapped
> space, but having it mapped allowed the processor to issue speculative
> accesses into reserved memory, causing system halts.
> 
> This was encountered somewhat rarely on a normal system boot, and much
> more often when starting the crash kernel if "crashkernel=512M,high"
> was specified on the command line (this heavily restricts the physical
> address of the crash kernel, in our case usually within 1 GiB of
> reserved space).
> 
> The solution is to invalidate the pages of this table outside the
> kernel image's space before the page table is activated.  This patch
> has been validated to fix this problem on our hardware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steve Wahl <steve.w...@hpe.com>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org

Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com>

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

Reply via email to