On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:39 PM Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.boss...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > The problem with solution #1 is freeing orphaned pointer. It will work, > > but it's simple is not okay from object life time prospective. > > ?? I don't get your point at all Andy. > Two allocations happens in a loop and if the second fails, you free the > first and then jump to free everything allocated in the previous > iterations. what am I missing?
Two things: - one allocation is done with kzalloc(), while the other one with devm_kcalloc() - due to above the ordering of resources is reversed -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
