On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 09:50:33AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Mika. > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 03:21:36PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > but from that discussion I don't see more generic solution to be > > implemented. > > > > Any ideas we should fix this properly? > > Yeah, the only fix I can think of is not using freezable wq. It's > just not a good idea and not all that difficult to avoid using.
OK, thanks. In that case I will just make a patch that removes WQ_FREEZABLE from bdi_wq and see what people think about it :)
