On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 07:53:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, October 3, 2019 2:15:37 PM CEST Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 12:27:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > + if (smp_processor_id() != 0) > > > > + return;
> Well, but the smp_processor_id() check has nothing to do with whether or not > this is "core" or "atom" or something else, for example. It is dodgy to begin with, it hard assumes we boot on cpu-0. A 'initialized' state would probably be better.