"mask_ofl_ipi" is used for iterate CPUs which IPIs are needed to send
to, however in the IPI sending loop, "mask_ofl_ipi" along with another
variable "mask_ofl_test" might also get modified to record which CPU's
quiesent state can be reported by sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(). Two
variables seems to be redundant for such a propose, so this patch clean
things a little by solely using "mask_ofl_test" for recording and
"mask_ofl_ipi" for iteration. This would improve the readibility of the
IPI sending loop in sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus().

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.f...@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 69c5aa64fcfd..212470018752 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -387,10 +387,10 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(struct 
work_struct *wp)
                }
                ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, rcu_exp_handler, NULL, 0);
                put_cpu();
-               if (!ret) {
-                       mask_ofl_ipi &= ~mask;
+               /* The CPU responses the IPI, and will report QS itself */
+               if (!ret)
                        continue;
-               }
+
                /* Failed, raced with CPU hotplug operation. */
                raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
                if ((rnp->qsmaskinitnext & mask) &&
@@ -401,13 +401,12 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus(struct 
work_struct *wp)
                        schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
                        goto retry_ipi;
                }
-               /* CPU really is offline, so we can ignore it. */
-               if (!(rnp->expmask & mask))
-                       mask_ofl_ipi &= ~mask;
+               /* CPU really is offline, and we need its QS to pass GP. */
+               if (rnp->expmask & mask)
+                       mask_ofl_test |= mask;
                raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
        }
        /* Report quiescent states for those that went offline. */
-       mask_ofl_test |= mask_ofl_ipi;
        if (mask_ofl_test)
                rcu_report_exp_cpu_mult(rnp, mask_ofl_test, false);
 }
-- 
2.23.0

Reply via email to