On Tue, 2019-10-08 at 11:40 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > When reading a patch file from standard input, checkpatch calls it "Your > patch", and reports its state as: > > Your patch has style problems, please review. > > or: > > Your patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission. > > Hence when checking multiple patches by piping them to checkpatch, e.g. > when checking patchwork bundles using: > > formail -s scripts/checkpatch.pl < bundle-foo.mbox > > it is difficult to identify which patches need to be reviewed and > improved. > > Fix this by replacing "Your patch" by the patch subject, if present. [] > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl [] > @@ -1047,6 +1047,10 @@ for my $filename (@ARGV) { > } > while (<$FILE>) { > chomp; > + if ($vname eq 'Your patch') { > + my ($subject) = $_ =~ /^Subject:\s*(.*)/; > + $vname = '"' . $subject . '"' if $subject;
Hi again Geert. Just some stylistic nits: $filename is not quoted so I think adding quotes before and after $subject may not be useful. Can you please use what checkpatch uses as a more common parenthesis style after an if? i.e. use: if (foo) not if foo so maybe: if ($filename eq '-' && $_ =~ /^Subject:\s*(.*)/) { $vname = $1; } or maybe $vname = $1 if ($filename eq '-' && $_ =~ /^Subject:\s*(.*)/);