Hi Rob/Robin,

On Tue, 2019-10-08 at 14:52 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com>
> 
> Since the "dma-ranges" property is only valid for a node representing a
> bus, of_dma_get_range() currently assumes the node passed in is a leaf
> representing a device, and starts the walk from its parent. In cases
> like PCI host controllers on typical FDT systems, however, where the PCI
> endpoints are probed dynamically the initial leaf node represents the
> 'bus' itself, and this logic means we fail to consider any "dma-ranges"
> describing the host bridge itself. Rework the logic such that
> of_dma_get_range() also works correctly starting from a bus node
> containing "dma-ranges".
> 
> While this does mean "dma-ranges" could incorrectly be in a device leaf
> node, there isn't really any way in this function to ensure that a leaf
> node is or isn't a bus node.

Sorry, I'm not totally sure if this is what you're pointing out with the last
sentence. But, what about the case of a bus configuring a device which also
happens to be a memory mapped bus (say a PCI platform device). It'll get it's
dma config based on its own dma-ranges which is not what we want.

> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com>
> [robh: Allow for the bus child node to still be passed in]
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org>
> ---
> Resending, hit send too quickly.
> 
> v2:
>  - Ensure once we find dma-ranges, every parent has it.

I like this new approach.

Regards,
Nicolas

>  - Only get the #{size,address}-cells after we find non-empty dma-ranges
>  - Add a check on the 'dma-ranges' length
> 
> This is all that remains of the dma-ranges series. I've applied the rest 
> of the series prep and fixes. I dropped "of: Ratify of_dma_configure() 
> interface" as the assertions that the node pointer being the parent only 
> when struct device doesn't have a DT node pointer is not always 
> true.
> 
> I didn't include any tested-bys as this has changed a bit. A git branch 
> is here[1].
> 
> Rob
> 
> [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git dma-masks-v2
> 
>  drivers/of/address.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c
> index 5ce69d026584..99c1b8058559 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/address.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/address.c
> @@ -930,47 +930,39 @@ int of_dma_get_range(struct device_node *np, u64
> *dma_addr, u64 *paddr, u64 *siz
>       const __be32 *ranges = NULL;
>       int len, naddr, nsize, pna;
>       int ret = 0;
> +     bool found_dma_ranges = false;
>       u64 dmaaddr;
>  
> -     if (!node)
> -             return -EINVAL;
> -
> -     while (1) {
> -             struct device_node *parent;
> -
> -             naddr = of_n_addr_cells(node);
> -             nsize = of_n_size_cells(node);
> -
> -             parent = __of_get_dma_parent(node);
> -             of_node_put(node);
> -
> -             node = parent;
> -             if (!node)
> -                     break;
> -
> +     while (node) {
>               ranges = of_get_property(node, "dma-ranges", &len);
>  
>               /* Ignore empty ranges, they imply no translation required */
>               if (ranges && len > 0)
>                       break;
>  
> -             /*
> -              * At least empty ranges has to be defined for parent node if
> -              * DMA is supported
> -              */
> -             if (!ranges)
> -                     break;
> +             /* Once we find 'dma-ranges', then a missing one is an error */
> +             if (found_dma_ranges && !ranges) {
> +                     ret = -ENODEV;
> +                     goto out;
> +             }
> +             found_dma_ranges = true;
> +
> +             node = of_get_next_dma_parent(node);
>       }
>  
> -     if (!ranges) {
> +     if (!node || !ranges) {
>               pr_debug("no dma-ranges found for node(%pOF)\n", np);
>               ret = -ENODEV;
>               goto out;
>       }
>  
> -     len /= sizeof(u32);
> -
> +     naddr = of_bus_n_addr_cells(node);
> +     nsize = of_bus_n_size_cells(node);
>       pna = of_n_addr_cells(node);
> +     if ((len / sizeof(__be32)) % (pna + naddr + nsize)) {
> +             ret = -EINVAL;
> +             goto out;
> +     }
>  
>       /* dma-ranges format:
>        * DMA addr     : naddr cells
> @@ -978,7 +970,7 @@ int of_dma_get_range(struct device_node *np, u64
> *dma_addr, u64 *paddr, u64 *siz
>        * size         : nsize cells
>        */
>       dmaaddr = of_read_number(ranges, naddr);
> -     *paddr = of_translate_dma_address(np, ranges);
> +     *paddr = of_translate_dma_address(node, ranges + naddr);
>       if (*paddr == OF_BAD_ADDR) {
>               pr_err("translation of DMA address(%llx) to CPU address failed
> node(%pOF)\n",
>                      dmaaddr, np);

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to