> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 6:00 AM
>  ...
> > Looking at the uses of VERSION_INVAL, I find one remaining occurrence
> > of this macro in vmbus_bus_resume(), which does:
> >
> >     if (vmbus_proto_version == VERSION_INVAL ||
> >         vmbus_proto_version == 0) {
> >             ...
> >     }
> >
> > TBH I'm looking at vmbus_bus_resume() and vmbus_bus_suspend() for the
> > first time and I'm not sure about how to change such check yet... any
> > suggestions?
> 
> Hm, I don't think vmbus_proto_version can ever become == VERSION_INVAL
> if we rewrite the code the way you suggest, right? So you'll reduce this
> to 'if (!vmbus_proto_version)' meaning we haven't negotiated any version
> (yet).

Yeah, Vitaly is correct. The check may be a little paranoid as I believe 
"vmbus_proto_version" must be a negotiated value in vmbus_bus_resume()
and vmbus_bus_suspend().  I added the check just in case.

> > Mmh, I see that vmbus_bus_resume() and vmbus_bus_suspend() can access
> > vmbus_connection.conn_state: can such accesses race with a concurrent
> > vmbus_connect()?
> 
> Let's summon Dexuan who's the author! :-)

There should not be an issue:

vmbus_connect() is called in the early subsys_initcall(hv_acpi_init).

vmbus_bus_suspend() is called late in the PM code after the kernel boots up, 
e.g.
in the hibernation function hibernation_snapshot() -> dpm_suspend(). 

vmbus_bus_resume() is also called later in late_initcall_sync(software_resume).

In the hibernatin process, vmbus_bus_suspend()/resume() can also be called a
few times, and vmbus_bus_resume() calls vmbus_negotiate_version(). As I
checked, there is no issue, either.

Thanks,
Dexuan

Reply via email to