Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 08:17:43PM CEST, mkube...@suse.cz wrote: >On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 05:25:59PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:59:40PM CEST, mkube...@suse.cz wrote:
[...] >> >+ >> >+/* generic notification handler */ >> >+static void ethnl_std_notify(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int cmd, >> >> Better "common" comparing to "standard", I believe. > >That's similar to ethnl_std_parse(), the idea is that this is the >standard handler for notifications which are triggered without >additional data and the message is the same as reply to corresponding >"GET" request (which is generated by the standard ethnl_get_doit() >handler). Notifications for actions and notifications for SET commands >which cannot be generated this standard way will have to use their own >(nonstandard) handler. So "default"? The "standard" sounds rather weird to me. It isn't any "standard" :)