The following commit has been merged into the irq/urgent branch of tip: Commit-ID: bb0fed1c60cccbe4063b455a7228818395dac86e Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/bb0fed1c60cccbe4063b455a7228818395dac86e Author: Marc Zyngier <m...@kernel.org> AuthorDate: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 15:17:45 +01:00 Committer: Marc Zyngier <m...@kernel.org> CommitterDate: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 12:29:52 +01:00
irqchip/sifive-plic: Switch to fasteoi flow The SiFive PLIC interrupt controller seems to have all the HW features to support the fasteoi flow, but the driver seems to be stuck in a distant past. Bring it into the 21st century. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <m...@kernel.org> Tested-by: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@sifive.com> (QEMU Boot) Tested-by: Darius Rad <dar...@bluespec.com> (on 2 HW PLIC implementations) Tested-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walms...@sifive.com> (HiFive Unleashed) Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@sifive.com> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8636gxskmj.wl-...@kernel.org --- drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 29 +++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c index cf75596..3e51dee 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static inline void plic_irq_toggle(const struct cpumask *mask, } } -static void plic_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d) +static void plic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d) { unsigned int cpu = cpumask_any_and(irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d), cpu_online_mask); @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static void plic_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d) plic_irq_toggle(cpumask_of(cpu), d->hwirq, 1); } -static void plic_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d) +static void plic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d) { plic_irq_toggle(cpu_possible_mask, d->hwirq, 0); } @@ -125,10 +125,8 @@ static int plic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) return -EINVAL; - if (!irqd_irq_disabled(d)) { - plic_irq_toggle(cpu_possible_mask, d->hwirq, 0); - plic_irq_toggle(cpumask_of(cpu), d->hwirq, 1); - } + plic_irq_toggle(cpu_possible_mask, d->hwirq, 0); + plic_irq_toggle(cpumask_of(cpu), d->hwirq, 1); irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu)); @@ -136,14 +134,18 @@ static int plic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, } #endif +static void plic_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d) +{ + struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers); + + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM); +} + static struct irq_chip plic_chip = { .name = "SiFive PLIC", - /* - * There is no need to mask/unmask PLIC interrupts. They are "masked" - * by reading claim and "unmasked" when writing it back. - */ - .irq_enable = plic_irq_enable, - .irq_disable = plic_irq_disable, + .irq_mask = plic_irq_mask, + .irq_unmask = plic_irq_unmask, + .irq_eoi = plic_irq_eoi, #ifdef CONFIG_SMP .irq_set_affinity = plic_set_affinity, #endif @@ -152,7 +154,7 @@ static struct irq_chip plic_chip = { static int plic_irqdomain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq, irq_hw_number_t hwirq) { - irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &plic_chip, handle_simple_irq); + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &plic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq); irq_set_chip_data(irq, NULL); irq_set_noprobe(irq); return 0; @@ -188,7 +190,6 @@ static void plic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) hwirq); else generic_handle_irq(irq); - writel(hwirq, claim); } csr_set(sie, SIE_SEIE); }
