On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 8:20 AM Benoit Parrot <bpar...@ti.com> wrote: > > Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> wrote on Tue [2019-Oct-15 17:29:47 -0500]: > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:56:26PM -0500, Benoit Parrot wrote: > > > Device Tree bindings for the Video Processing Engine (VPE) driver. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bpar...@ti.com> > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/media/ti-vpe.txt | 48 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > > 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti-vpe.txt > > > > Please convert to DT schema format. > > I can do that. > Before posting/merging a .yaml, are we supposed to be able to pass these? > # make dt_binding_check > # make dtbs_check
Only dt_binding_check needs to be warning free. It is good to test your schema with dtbs_check and make sure any warnings seem valid. > Because currently with 5.4-rc3 these fails. Yeah, still waiting on regulator and media fixes. :( linux-next is fixed. > Is there a way to run these "test command" target a specific .yaml and not > the whole set? Yes, it's documented in writing-schema.rst. Use DT_SCHEMA_FILES to test just your schema file. [...] > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > index 8598f49fa2c8..63dcda51f8ae 100644 > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > @@ -16299,6 +16299,7 @@ W: http://linuxtv.org/ > > > Q: http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/list/ > > > S: Maintained > > > F: drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/ > > > +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti-vpe.txt > > Now with the dt_schemas, I noticed that the maintainer's name is part of > the yaml file. Do we still need to add this to the MAINTAINERS file as > well? Within the schema is really preparation for having schema outside of the kernel tree and because lots of bindings don't have a MAINTAINERS entry. So yes, you can still have both. Rob
