From: Josef Bacik <jo...@toxicpanda.com>

commit c5f4987e86f6692fdb12533ea1fc7a7bb98e555a upstream.

Coverity caught a case where we could return with a uninitialized value
in ret in process_leaf.  This is actually pretty likely because we could
very easily run into a block group item key and have a garbage value in
ret and think there was an errror.  Fix this by initializing ret to 0.

Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
Fixes: fd708b81d972 ("Btrfs: add a extent ref verify tool")
CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jo...@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ static int process_leaf(struct btrfs_roo
        struct btrfs_extent_data_ref *dref;
        struct btrfs_shared_data_ref *sref;
        u32 count;
-       int i = 0, tree_block_level = 0, ret;
+       int i = 0, tree_block_level = 0, ret = 0;
        struct btrfs_key key;
        int nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(leaf);
 


Reply via email to