Hi!

> From: Erik Schmauss <erik.schma...@intel.com>
> 
> Commit b5eab512e7cffb2bb37c4b342b5594e9e75fd486 upstream.

So this introduces another format of "upstream" information. So far I
had this:

                ma = re.match(".*Upstream commit ([0-9a-f]*) .*", l)
                ...
                ma = re.match("commit ([0-9a-f]*) upstream[.]*", l)

I believe this information belongs to the signoff area; it is
important to know who pushed patch to the upstream and who is pusing
it to the stable.

Could we just introduce "Upstream: <sha1>" tag and use it? It would
improve consistency...

Thanks,
                                                                Pavel

> ACPICA commit c736ea34add19a3a07e0e398711847cd6b95affd
> 
> Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/c736ea34
> Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss <erik.schma...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.mo...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.ga...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) 
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to