On 10/19/2019 8:19 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Use the new ports list instead of accessing the dsa_switch array
> of ports in the dsa_to_port helper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/net/dsa.h | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
> index 6ff6dfcdc61d..938de9518c61 100644
> --- a/include/net/dsa.h
> +++ b/include/net/dsa.h
> @@ -285,7 +285,14 @@ struct dsa_switch {
>
> static inline struct dsa_port *dsa_to_port(struct dsa_switch *ds, int p)
> {
> - return &ds->ports[p];
> + struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
> + struct dsa_port *dp;
I would initialize this to NULL and always return dp
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list)
> + if (dp->ds == ds && dp->index == p)
> + return dp;
and do a break here, but this is strictly identical to your code, so it
boils down to a matter of preference.
Do you possibly need to use list_for_ech_entry_safe() here, especially
for the code paths that deal with the unregistering of a switch/switch
fabric? That also raises the question of locking as well, which can be
punted on the caller if that is appropriate.
Other than that:
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>
--
Florian
