> +static struct dsa_port *dsa_port_touch(struct dsa_switch *ds, int index)
> +{
> +     struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
> +     struct dsa_port *dp;
> +
> +     dp = &ds->ports[index];
> +
> +     dp->ds = ds;
> +     dp->index = index;
> +
> +     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dp->list);
> +     list_add(&dp->list, &dst->ports);
> +
> +     return dp;
> +}

Bike shedding, but i don't particularly like the name touch.  How
about list. The opposite would then be delist, if we ever need it?

Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <[email protected]>

    Andrew

Reply via email to