On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 15:13, Chuhong Yuan <hsleste...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> renesas_sdhi_probe misses checks for pinctrl_lookup_state and may miss
> failures.
> Add checks for them to fix the problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hsleste...@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> index d4ada5cca2d1..dc5ad6632df3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/renesas_sdhi_core.c
> @@ -694,8 +694,13 @@ int renesas_sdhi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> if (!IS_ERR(priv->pinctrl)) {
> priv->pins_default = pinctrl_lookup_state(priv->pinctrl,
> PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT);
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->pins_default))
> + return PTR_ERR(priv->pins_default);
> +
> priv->pins_uhs = pinctrl_lookup_state(priv->pinctrl,
> "state_uhs");
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->pins_uhs))
> + return PTR_ERR(priv->pins_uhs);
> }
This looks correct to me, as I guess if there is a pinctrl specified
for device node of the controller, it means that it should be used!?
I understand that this is only used for those variants that supports
UHS-I via the renesas_sdhi_start_signal_voltage_switch(). Wolfram, is
this fine you think?
>
> host = tmio_mmc_host_alloc(pdev, mmc_data);
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Kind regards
Uffe
