On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 04:04:39PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 02:56:57PM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
> > > > Does it seem like what the c2c does?
> > > 
> > > well c2c has its own data output with multiline column titles,
> > > hence it has its own separate dimension stuff, but your code
> > > output is within the standard perf report right? single column
> > > output.. why couldn't you use just sort_entry ?
> > > 
> > > jirka
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi Jiri,
> > 
> > I've being thinking how to use sort_entry but I have some troubles.
> > 
> > In v2, I used "struct perf_hpp_fmt" to pass extra argument. For example,
> > 
> > static int64_t block_cycles_cov_sort(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
> >                                  struct hist_entry *left,
> >                                  struct hist_entry *right)
> > {
> >     struct block_fmt *block_fmt = container_of(fmt, ...);
> >     struct report *rep = block_fmt->rep;
> >     ...
> > }
> > 
> > But if I just use sort_entry, I can't pass extra argument (it's not a good
> > idea to add more fields in struct hist_entry).
> > 
> > int64_t sort__xxx_sort(struct hist_entry *left,
> >                    struct hist_entry *right)
> > 
> > And for entry print it's similar, I can't pass extra argument in.
> > 
> > In v2,
> > static int block_cycles_pct_entry(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
> >                               struct perf_hpp *hpp,
> >                               struct hist_entry *he)
> > {
> >     struct block_fmt *block_fmt = container_of(fmt,...);
> >     struct report *rep = block_fmt->rep;
> >     ...
> > }
> > 
> > But for se_snprintf, I can't pass extra argument in.
> > 
> > hist_entry__xxx_snprintf(struct hist_entry *he, char *bf,
> >                      size_t size, unsigned int width)
> > 
> > That's why I feel headache for just using the sort_entry. :(
> 
> you might be right, I just want to omit another field output framework ;-) 
> I'm checking on this and will let you know if I find some way

ok, because it's based on branch data the sort entry would not be
convenient.. I'm sending some other comments for the patch

thanks,
jirka

Reply via email to