On Wed 23-10-19 10:56:30, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 10/23/19 6:27 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
> >
> > pagetypeinfo_showfree_print is called by zone->lock held in irq mode.
> > This is not really nice because it blocks both any interrupts on that
> > cpu and the page allocator. On large machines this might even trigger
> > the hard lockup detector.
> >
> > Considering the pagetypeinfo is a debugging tool we do not really need
> > exact numbers here. The primary reason to look at the outuput is to see
> > how pageblocks are spread among different migratetypes therefore putting
> > a bound on the number of pages on the free_list sounds like a reasonable
> > tradeoff.
> >
> > The new output will simply tell
> > [...]
> > Node 6, zone Normal, type Movable >100000 >100000 >100000 >100000
> > 41019 31560 23996 10054 3229 983 648
> >
> > instead of
> > Node 6, zone Normal, type Movable 399568 294127 221558 102119
> > 41019 31560 23996 10054 3229 983 648
> >
> > The limit has been chosen arbitrary and it is a subject of a future
> > change should there be a need for that.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
> > ---
> > mm/vmstat.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
> > index 4e885ecd44d1..762034fc3b83 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmstat.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
> > @@ -1386,8 +1386,25 @@ static void pagetypeinfo_showfree_print(struct
> > seq_file *m,
> >
> > area = &(zone->free_area[order]);
> >
> > - list_for_each(curr, &area->free_list[mtype])
> > + list_for_each(curr, &area->free_list[mtype]) {
> > freecount++;
> > + /*
> > + * Cap the free_list iteration because it might
> > + * be really large and we are under a spinlock
> > + * so a long time spent here could trigger a
> > + * hard lockup detector. Anyway this is a
> > + * debugging tool so knowing there is a handful
> > + * of pages in this order should be more than
> > + * sufficient
> > + */
> > + if (freecount > 100000) {
> > + seq_printf(m, ">%6lu ", freecount);
> > + spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lock);
> > + cond_resched();
> > + spin_lock_irq(&zone->lock);
> > + continue;
> list_for_each() is a for loop. The continue statement will just iterate
> the rests with the possibility that curr will be stale. Should we use
> goto to jump after the seq_print() below?
You are right. Kinda brown paper back material. Sorry about that. What
about this on top?
---
diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
index 762034fc3b83..c156ce24a322 100644
--- a/mm/vmstat.c
+++ b/mm/vmstat.c
@@ -1383,11 +1383,11 @@ static void pagetypeinfo_showfree_print(struct seq_file
*m,
unsigned long freecount = 0;
struct free_area *area;
struct list_head *curr;
+ bool overflow = false;
area = &(zone->free_area[order]);
list_for_each(curr, &area->free_list[mtype]) {
- freecount++;
/*
* Cap the free_list iteration because it might
* be really large and we are under a spinlock
@@ -1397,15 +1397,15 @@ static void pagetypeinfo_showfree_print(struct seq_file
*m,
* of pages in this order should be more than
* sufficient
*/
- if (freecount > 100000) {
- seq_printf(m, ">%6lu ", freecount);
+ if (++freecount >= 100000) {
+ overflow = true;
spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lock);
cond_resched();
spin_lock_irq(&zone->lock);
- continue;
+ break;
}
}
- seq_printf(m, "%6lu ", freecount);
+ seq_printf(m, "%s%6lu ", overflow ? ">" : "",
freecount);
}
seq_putc(m, '\n');
}
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
