Gautham R Shenoy <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:46:35PM -0700, Tyrel Datwyler wrote: >> On 4/7/20 1:47 AM, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: >> > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > This is the fifth version of the patches to track and expose idle PURR >> > and SPURR ticks. These patches are required by tools such as lparstat >> > to compute system utilization for capacity planning purposes. ... >> > >> > Gautham R. Shenoy (5): >> > powerpc: Move idle_loop_prolog()/epilog() functions to header file >> > powerpc/idle: Store PURR snapshot in a per-cpu global variable >> > powerpc/pseries: Account for SPURR ticks on idle CPUs >> > powerpc/sysfs: Show idle_purr and idle_spurr for every CPU >> > Documentation: Document sysfs interfaces purr, spurr, idle_purr, >> > idle_spurr >> > >> > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 39 +++++++++ >> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/idle.h | 93 >> > ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 82 >> > ++++++++++++++++++- >> > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c | 8 +- >> > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c | 39 ++------- >> > 5 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) >> > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/idle.h >> > >> >> Reviewed-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyr...@linux.ibm.com> > > Thanks for reviewing the patches. > >> >> Any chance this is going to be merged in the near future? There is a >> patchset to >> update lparstat in the powerpc-utils package to calculate PURR/SPURR cpu >> utilization that I would like to merge, but have been holding off to make >> sure >> we are synced with this proposed patchset. > > Michael, could you please consider this for 5.8 ?
Yes. Has it been tested on KVM at all? cheers