> Thanks for your feedback, and yes, I'd like to further adjust the description > details > to make the patch more clear and better.
Thanks for such a positive response. > But because Jakub seems to prefer v1, so I'm somehow confused Such a view can be reasonable. The change acceptance varies between involved contributors. > if I should submit a new version based on v1 Such a choice depends also on your willingness to clarify and improve the software situation by better commit messages. > or based on the version that has an addition of a jump target? I propose that you can offer patch series with two update steps (for example) according to the affected function implementation. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=47cf1b422e6093aee2a3e55d5e162112a2c69870#n102 1. Add a missing function call for the completion of the desired resource clean-up. 2. Adjust a bit of exception handling code so that it can be better reused at the end of this function. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?id=47cf1b422e6093aee2a3e55d5e162112a2c69870#n450 I am curious if you are going to answer (my) previous questions and suggestions (in constructive ways). Regards, Markus
