On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:12 PM 'Marco Elver' via Clang Built Linux <clang-built-li...@googlegroups.com> wrote: > On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 16:04, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote: > > With the kcsan changes, __read_once_size() is not inlined, but > > clang can decide to emit a version that hardcodes the address, which > > in turn triggers a warning for dss_conv_list being __initdata but > > __read_once_size() not being __init: > > > > WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x6e4d7a): Section mismatch in > > reference from the function __read_once_size() to the variable > > .init.data:dss_conv_list > > The function __read_once_size() references > > the variable __initdata dss_conv_list. > > This is often because __read_once_size lacks a __initdata > > annotation or the annotation of dss_conv_list is wrong. > > > > This is clearly a false positive warning, but it's hard to tell > > who is to blame for it. Work around it by removing the __initdata > > annotation, wasting the space of two pointers in return for getting > > rid of the warning. > > > > Fixes: dfd402a4c4ba ("kcsan: Add Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer > > infrastructure") > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > > [+Cc Will] > > I think Will is working on a series that completely overhauls > READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE, also getting rid of __read_once_size() in the > process, which would make this patch redundant. If we can live with > this warning until the new READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE gets merged, we can > probably keep things as-is for now.
Ok, let's drop this one for now. Arnd