On Mon, 11 May 2020, Al Cooper wrote:

> Add a new EHCI driver for Broadcom STB SoC's. A new EHCI driver
> was created instead of adding support to the existing ehci platform
> driver because of the code required to work around bugs in the EHCI
> controller. The primary workaround is for a bug where the Core
> violates the SOF interval between the first two SOFs transmitted after
> resume. This only happens if the resume occurs near the end of a
> microframe. The fix is to intercept the ehci-hcd request to complete
> RESUME and align it to the start of the next microframe.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Al Cooper <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
> ---

I hate to point this out...

> +static int ehci_brcm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +     struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +     struct resource *res_mem;
> +     struct brcm_priv *priv;
> +     struct usb_hcd *hcd;
> +     int irq;
> +     int err;
> +
> +     err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> +     if (err)
> +             return err;
> +
> +     irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> +     if (irq <= 0)
> +             return irq ? irq : EINVAL;

That should be -EINVAL.

To tell the truth, I'm not sure it's worthwhile checking for irq == 0.  
That's up to Greg to decide.

Anyway, as far as I'm concerned you can either change EINVAL to -EINVAL
or change the whole thing back to "if (irq < 0) return irq;".  Either
way, you may add:

Acked-by: Alan Stern <[email protected]>

Alan Stern

Reply via email to