On 12. 05. 20, 13:53, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Warn the upper layer when n_gms is ready to receive data
> again. Without this the associated virtual tty remains blocked
> indefinitely.
> 
> Fixes: e1eaea46bb40 ("tty: n_gsm line discipline")
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> index d8d196645500..69200bd411f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> @@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ static struct gsm_msg *gsm_data_alloc(struct gsm_mux 
> *gsm, u8 addr, int len,
>   *   FIXME: lock against link layer control transmissions
>   */
>  
> -static void gsm_data_kick(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
> +static void gsm_data_kick(struct gsm_mux *gsm, struct gsm_dlci *dlci)
>  {
>       struct gsm_msg *msg, *nmsg;
>       int len;
> @@ -695,6 +695,24 @@ static void gsm_data_kick(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
>  
>               list_del(&msg->list);
>               kfree(msg);
> +
> +             if (dlci) {
> +                     tty_port_tty_wakeup(&dlci->port);
> +             } else {
> +                     int i = 0;
> +
> +                     for (i = 0; i < NUM_DLCI; i++) {
> +                             struct gsm_dlci *dlci;
> +
> +                             dlci = gsm->dlci[i];
> +                             if (dlci == NULL) {
> +                                     i++;

This "i++" looks bogus here.

> +                                     continue;
> +                             }
> +
> +                             tty_port_tty_wakeup(&dlci->port);


So simply:
for (i = 0; i < NUM_DLCI; i++) {
  struct gsm_dlci *dlci = gsm->dlci[i];
  if (dlci)
    tty_port_tty_wakeup(&dlci->port);
}

? Or even maybe directly:
for (i = 0; i < NUM_DLCI; i++)
  if (gsm->dlci[i])
    tty_port_tty_wakeup(&gsm->dlci[i]->port);

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs

Reply via email to