Since there will be some changes to how iio_priv_to_dev() is implemented,
it could be that the helper becomes a bit slower, as it will be hidden away
in the IIO core.

But even without that rework, this looks like it can pass the 'indio_dev'
object to ping_read() and obtain the state struct via iio_priv() which is a
preferred practice than going back-n-forth (getting the state-struct, then
using iio_priv_to_dev() to get the indio_dev object back).

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardel...@analog.com>
---

Changelog v1 -> v2:
* split away from series
* pass 'indio_dev' to ping_read() and get the info via iio_priv()

 drivers/iio/proximity/ping.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/ping.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/ping.c
index 12b893c5b0ee..2e99eeb27f2e 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/proximity/ping.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/ping.c
@@ -89,14 +89,14 @@ static irqreturn_t ping_handle_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
        return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
-static int ping_read(struct ping_data *data)
+static int ping_read(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
 {
+       struct ping_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
        int ret;
        ktime_t ktime_dt;
        s64 dt_ns;
        u32 time_ns, distance_mm;
        struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(data->dev);
-       struct iio_dev *indio_dev = iio_priv_to_dev(data);
 
        /*
         * just one read-echo-cycle can take place at a time
@@ -228,7 +228,6 @@ static int ping_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
                            struct iio_chan_spec const *channel, int *val,
                            int *val2, long info)
 {
-       struct ping_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
        int ret;
 
        if (channel->type != IIO_DISTANCE)
@@ -236,7 +235,7 @@ static int ping_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
 
        switch (info) {
        case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
-               ret = ping_read(data);
+               ret = ping_read(indio_dev);
                if (ret < 0)
                        return ret;
                *val = ret;
-- 
2.25.1

Reply via email to