On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:14:57AM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 03:42:17AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 03:34:29AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > >
> > > This patchset is rebased and tested on the mainline Linux kernel 5.7-rc4:
> > > base-commit: 0e698dfa2822 ("Linux 5.7-rc4")
> > > tag: v5.7-rc4
> >
> > Thomas,
> > Please note that this patchset is based on the Linux 5.7-rc4 tree (it most
> > likely
> > will get cleanly applied on rc6 as well), while mips-next is still at rc1.
> > Due
> > to that the patchset fails to be applied on mips-next. I think it would be
> > better first to merge the last Linux tree into the mips-next, then try to
> > merge
> > this patchset in. Should you have any problem after that, please let me
> > know.
> > I'll resend the patchset being rebased on top of the new mips-next tree.
>
> no, that's not how it works. Please rebase your patches on top of
> mips-next. Thank you.
Ok. I'll do it shortly and discard the commit 37353ec964e8 ("mips: MAAR: Use
more
precise address mask") since you have already applied it on to the mips-next
branch.
-Sergey
>
> Thomas.
>
> --
> Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
> good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
