On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 04:59:42PM +0200, Sebastian A. Siewior wrote: > On 2020-05-22 19:55:03 [+0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > That is both more consistent with the things you claim it's modelled > > after and also completely avoids that header dependency. > > So we need additionally: > > - #include <linux/sched.h> in include/linux/flex_proportions.h > and I think un another file as well. > > - write_seqcount_t_begin_nested() as a define > > - write_seqcount_t_begin() as a define > > Any "static inline" in the header file using > lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled() will tro to complain about missing > current-> define. But yes, it will work otherwise. Because...? /me rummages around.. Ah you're proposing sticking this in seqcount itself and then header hell. Moo.. ok I'll go have another look on Monday.
