On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 16:54 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 5/26/20 4:27 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 11:04 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > On 5/22/20 8:26 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 20:19 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > > > get_maintainer.pl picks only the first email address found in the > > > > > file. > > > > > Reorder my email addresses so it finds my linuxfoundation.org email. > > > > > > > > OK. > > [] > > > Sadly, people that don't run get_maintainer.pl, leave alone running it > > > with --noremove-duplicates option. So your suggestion doesn't really > > > help me. > > > > > > My preference is to get patches to both Inboxes if possible which isn't > > > possible unless -noremove-duplicate is default. Having this option as > > > default probably will annoy lot of people . So I am not asking for > > > that. > > > > > > That being said, I don't understand your comment. Are you recommending > > > using just one email in these entries? > > > > Yes. And maybe set an autoforward rule in that email to > > forward the received email to your other address. > > > > > Sounds good.
Another option would be to write your name slightly differently in the 2 entries. For instance, add "(LF)" to the linuxfoundation.org entry like: CPU POWER MONITORING SUBSYSTEM M: Thomas Renninger <[email protected]> M: Shuah Khan <[email protected]> M: Shuah Khan (LF) <[email protected]> L: [email protected] S: Maintained F: tools/power/cpupower/ and then the get_maintainer.pl script won't collapse the equally named but with different email addresses into a single entry: $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f tools/power/cpupower/ Thomas Renninger <[email protected]> (maintainer:CPU POWER MONITORING SUBSYSTEM) Shuah Khan <[email protected]> (maintainer:CPU POWER MONITORING SUBSYSTEM) "Shuah Khan (LF)" <[email protected]> (maintainer:CPU POWER MONITORING SUBSYSTEM) [email protected] (open list:CPU POWER MONITORING SUBSYSTEM) [email protected] (open list)
