回复: [PATCH v5] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq()

[Zhang, Qiang]

Thanks for your guide.
I will try to change the weakness of weak wording.

________________________________________
发件人: Zhang, Qiang <qiang.zh...@windriver.com>
发送时间: 2020年5月28日 9:41
收件人: Markus Elfring; Tejun Heo; Lai Jiangshan
抄送: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org
主题: 回复: [PATCH v5] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq()

Thanks for your guide. I tried to change the weakness of weak wording


________________________________
发件人: linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org> 代表 
Markus Elfring <markus.elfr...@web.de>
发送时间: 2020年5月27日 16:20
收件人: Zhang, Qiang <qiang.zh...@windriver.com>; Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>; Lai 
Jiangshan <jiangshan...@gmail.com>
抄送: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; 
kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org <kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org>
主题: Re: [PATCH v5] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq()

> Thus delete this function call which became unnecessary with the referenced
> software update.
…
> Suggested-by: Markus Elfring <markus.elfr...@web.de>

Would the tag “Co-developed-by” be more appropriate according to the patch 
review
to achieve a more pleasing commit message?


>  v1->v2->v3->v4->v5:
>  Modify weakly submitted information.

Now I wonder about your wording choice “weakly”.

Regards,
Markus