> Yeah, regardless of who puts a wq the last time, the base reference is put > by destroy_workqueue() and thus it's guaranteed that a wq can't be rcu freed > without going through destroy_workqueue(). lol I'm undoing the revert.
* Would you like to add such background information to the change description? * How do you think about integrate a following patch version after the extra clarification? Regards, Markus
