Markus Elfring <markus.elfr...@web.de> wrote:
> > sysnames should be freed after refcnt being decreased to zero in
> > afs_put_sysnames().
>
> How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
>
> Release the sysnames object after its reference counter was decreased
> to zero.
I would say "reference count" not "reference counter" personally. I would
also say "afs_sysnames" rather than "sysnames". Perhaps something like:
Fix afs_put_sysnames() to actually free the specified afs_sysnames
object after its reference count has been decreased to zero and its
contents have been released.
> Will it matter to mention the size of the data structure "afs_sysnames"?
Why is it necessary to do so?
David
