On 02/06/2020 14:10, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/06/02 12:27), Hans Verkuil wrote:
> [..]
>>> Sorry, Hans, do you suggest to have something like this:
>>>
>>> if (q->memory == VB2_MEMORY_DMABUF) {
>>> vb->need_cache_sync_on_finish = 0;
>>> vb->need_cache_sync_on_prepare = 0;
>>> b->flags &= ~V4L2_BUF_FLAG_NO_CACHE_INVALIDATE;
>>> b->flags &= ~V4L2_BUF_FLAG_NO_CACHE_CLEAN;
>>> return;
>>> }
>>>
>>> I didn't clear the ->flags there because we clear the vb flush/sync
>>> flags: ->need_cache_sync_on_finish/prepare are zeros for DMABUF memory
>>> type. Which is equivalent to passing V4L2_BUF_FLAG_NO_CACHE_INVALIDATE
>>> V4L2_BUF_FLAG_NO_CACHE_CLEAN. IOW we would clearing both "vb's do cache
>>> sync" and request's "do not cache sync".
>>
>> Ah, yes. In that case the v4l-utils patch is likely wrong.
>> Can you take a look at that patch?
>
> Hans, are we talking about "v4l2-utils: test cache_hints for MMAP queues"
> patch? I can take a look, yes.
Yes, that's the one.
Hans
