> On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 01:10:34PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > > > The original patch was basically fine. > > > > I propose to reconsider the interpretation of the software situation once > > more. > > > > * Should the allocated clock object be kept usable even after > > a successful return from this function? > > Heh. You're right. The patch is freeing "clk" on the success path so > that doesn't work. >
Ben has explained this problem: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1249592/ Since the caller will check "pclk" on failure, we don't need to free "clk" in gm20b_clk_new() and I think this patch is no longer needed. Regards, Dinghao
