On 09/06/2020 05:34, Vinod Koul wrote:
Hi Jonathan,

On 08-06-20, 16:43, Jonathan Marek wrote:
Adds support for qcom soundwire devices with memory mapped IO registers.

Please use 'SoundWire Master devices' instead :)


Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonat...@marek.ca>
---
  drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
index f38d1fd3679f..628747df1c75 100644
--- a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
        struct sdw_bus bus;
        struct device *dev;
        struct regmap *regmap;
+       void __iomem *mmio;
        struct completion *comp;
        struct work_struct slave_work;
        /* read/write lock */
@@ -154,6 +155,20 @@ static int qcom_swrm_ahb_reg_write(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl 
*ctrl,
        return SDW_CMD_OK;
  }
+static int qcom_swrm_cpu_reg_read(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg,
+                                 u32 *val)
+{
+       *val = readl(ctrl->mmio + reg);
+       return SDW_CMD_OK;
+}
+
+static int qcom_swrm_cpu_reg_write(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg,
+                                  int val)
+{
+       writel(val, ctrl->mmio + reg);
+       return SDW_CMD_OK;
+}

this looks fine but regmap supports mmio also, so I am thinking we
should remove these and set regmap (mmio/slim)... Srini..?

That is doable, but not going to add great value in this case, unless we are having another layer of abstraction. So keeping it as readl/writel seems okay to me.

--srini



Reply via email to