On Wed, 2020-06-24 at 16:17 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > Apologies for delay in my reply as I was busy with some other stuff. > > On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 20:30, James Bottomley > <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> wrote: [...] > > it's about consistency with what the kernel types mean. When some > > checker detects your using little endian operations on a big endian > > structure (like in the prink for instance) they're going to keep > > emailing you about it. > > As mentioned above, using different terminology is meant to cause > more confusion than just difference in endianness which is manageable > inside TEE. > > And I think it's safe to say that the kernel implements UUID in big > endian format and thus uses %pUb whereas OP-TEE implements UUID in > little endian format and thus uses %pUl.
So what I think you're saying is that if we still had uuid_be and uuid_le you'd use uuid_le, because that's exactly the structure described in the docs. But because we renamed uuid_be -> uuid_t uuid_le -> guid_t You can't use guid_t as a kernel type because it has the wrong name? James
