Em Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:57:59PM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu: > > The name could be a metric or an event, the logic for each is quite > > I would say collisions are unlikely. Event names follow quite structured > patterns.
And when introducing a new metric the build process can detect that clash and fail. > > different. You could look up an event and when it fails assume it was > > a metric, but I like the simplicity of this approach. > I don't think it's simpler for the user. Agreed. > > Maybe this > > change could be adopted more widely with something like "perf stat -e > > metric:IPC -a -I 1000" rather than the current "perf stat -M IPC -a -I > > 1000". > > I thought about just adding metrics to -e, without metric: of course. Ditto. - Arnaldo
