On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:40:34PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:48 PM Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Adding test that compute metric with other metrics in it.
> >
> >   cache_miss_cycles = metric:dcache_miss_cpi + metric:icache_miss_cycles
> >
> 
> This is really nice! Do we need to do anything in tests/pmu-events.c?
> Presumably if a metric is referencing another metric the call to
> expr__parse there will test the other metric is parseable. Just wanted
> to sanity check.

right, I did not realize that, but that test is passing for me,
so I guess it's fine.. I'll double check

thanks,
jirka

> 
> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c 
> > b/tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c
> > index 8c48251425e1..feb97f7c90c8 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c
> > @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
> >  #include "debug.h"
> >  #include "expr.h"
> >  #include "stat.h"
> > +#include <perf/cpumap.h>
> > +#include <perf/evlist.h>
> >
> >  static struct pmu_event pme_test[] = {
> >  {
> > @@ -22,6 +24,18 @@ static struct pmu_event pme_test[] = {
> >                           "( 1 + cpu_clk_unhalted.one_thread_active / 
> > cpu_clk_unhalted.ref_xclk ) )))",
> >         .metric_name    = "Frontend_Bound_SMT",
> >  },
> > +{
> > +       .metric_expr    = "l1d\\-loads\\-misses / inst_retired.any",
> > +       .metric_name    = "dcache_miss_cpi",
> > +},
> > +{
> > +       .metric_expr    = "l1i\\-loads\\-misses / inst_retired.any",
> > +       .metric_name    = "icache_miss_cycles",
> > +},
> > +{
> > +       .metric_expr    = "(metric:dcache_miss_cpi + 
> > metric:icache_miss_cycles)",
> > +       .metric_name    = "cache_miss_cycles",
> > +},
> >  };
> >
> >  static struct pmu_events_map map = {
> > @@ -162,9 +176,28 @@ static int test_frontend(void)
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int test_cache_miss_cycles(void)
> > +{
> > +       double ratio;
> > +       struct value vals[] = {
> > +               { .event = "l1d-loads-misses",  .val = 300 },
> > +               { .event = "l1i-loads-misses",  .val = 200 },
> > +               { .event = "inst_retired.any",  .val = 400 },
> > +               { 0 },
> > +       };
> > +
> > +       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to compute metric",
> > +                       compute_metric("cache_miss_cycles", vals, &ratio) 
> > == 0);
> > +
> > +       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("cache_miss_cycles failed, wrong ratio",
> > +                       ratio == 1.25);
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  int test__parse_metric(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest 
> > __maybe_unused)
> >  {
> >         TEST_ASSERT_VAL("IPC failed", test_ipc() == 0);
> >         TEST_ASSERT_VAL("frontend failed", test_frontend() == 0);
> > +       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("cache_miss_cycles failed", 
> > test_cache_miss_cycles() == 0);
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > --
> > 2.25.4
> >
> 

Reply via email to