On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 09:39:29 +1000 Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't totally agree on that, because like the CoC discussion, people > need concrete examples. People need reasons, saying simply "be > inclusive" doesn't work. Which people? because so far the only people I've seen take these terminologies out of computing context, are those who are only voicing their "concern" out of bad faith, as well as those who fall for the concern-trolling bait. The meta-discussion serves to stir up noise and waste time that's better spent on other things. History pains, sure, but I believe it serves no justice to erase every trace of bad things that happened in history. That includes use of words tangentially related to such events. -- wowaname <https://wowana.me/pgp.xht>