On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:43:16AM +0530, Madhuparna Bhowmik wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 02:02:44PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:18:46PM +0530, madhuparnabhowmi...@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
> > > From: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmi...@gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > This patch fixes the macro _list_check_srcu() for CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST =
> > > False.
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmi...@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Thank you, Madhuparna!  I am folding this into your original, but
> > with lowercase "true".
> >
> I am really sorry and thanks for applying this with the correction.

No worries!  Just thought that I should mention it in case there was
some subtle reason why TRUE was needed in this case.  ;-)

                                                        Thanx, Paul

> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/rculist.h | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h
> > > index 516b4feb2682..a435ad62b90b 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/rculist.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/rculist.h
> > > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static inline void INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(struct list_head 
> > > *list)
> > >  #define __list_check_rcu(dummy, cond, extra...)                          
> > > \
> > >   ({ check_arg_count_one(extra); })
> > >  
> > > -#define __list_check_srcu(cond)
> > > +#define __list_check_srcu(cond)  TRUE
> > >  #endif
> > >  
> > >  /*
> > > -- 
> > > 2.17.1
> > > 

Reply via email to