Thanks for your reply.
> >
> > /* validiate cached dentries */
> > - for (i = 1; i < num_entries; i++) {
> > - ep = exfat_get_dentry_cached(es, i);
> > - if (!exfat_validate_entry(exfat_get_entry_type(ep), &mode))
>
> > + for (i = 1; i < es->num_entries; i++) {
> > + if (!exfat_get_validated_dentry(es, i, TYPE_SECONDARY))
> > goto free_es;
> > }
> > + if (!exfat_get_validated_dentry(es, 1, TYPE_STREAM))
> > + goto free_es;
>
> It looks better to move checking TYPE_STREAM above the for-loop.
> And then for-loop should start from index 2.
OK. I'll change that.
However, this for-loop is considering changing to checksum verification.
> BTW, do you think it is enough to check only TYPE_SECONDARY not TYPE NAME?
> As you might know, FILE, STREAM and NAME entries must be consecutive in order.
I think it is appropriate as a check here.
TYPE_NAME starting without index=2 doesn't accept in
exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry().
However, I think this is not enough.
This is because there is no check for name-length. (same with or without patch)
I will check the name-length in the next(or after next) patch.
BR
---
Kohada Tetsuhiro <kohada.tetsuh...@dc.mitsubishielectric.co.jp>
