Hi Adrian,

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 9:46 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
<glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> On 7/15/20 9:27 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> [    5.464000] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at mm/slab.c:2589 
> >> cache_alloc_refill+0x216/0x6a0
> >> [    5.464000] Modules linked in:
> >> [    5.464000]
> >> [    5.464000] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted 
> >> 5.8.0-rc5-00026-g22b7a96ece82 #3
> >> [    5.464000] PC is at cache_alloc_refill+0x216/0x6a0
> >> [    5.464000] PR is at kmem_cache_alloc+0xd6/0x128
> >> [    5.464000] PC  : 800ec0d2 SP  : 9f445e68 SR  : 400080f0
> >> [    5.464000] TEA : c00c30d0
> >> [    5.464000] R0  : 8062724c R1  : 8000fee8 R2  : 9f403540 R3  : 00000100
> >> [    5.464000] R4  : 9f403500 R5  : 00000000 R6  : 8068d5b0 R7  : 007fffff
> >> [    5.464000] R8  : 0000000c R9  : 9f403500 R10 : 8096fc0c R11 : 80044410
> >> [    5.464000] R12 : 9f405060 R13 : 00000dc0 R14 : 9f445e68
> >> [    5.464000] MACH: 10623bba MACL: 00000cc0 GBR : 2957bd58 PR  : 800ec80a
> >> [    5.464000]
> >> [    5.464000] Call trace:
> >> [    5.464000]  [<(ptrval)>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x0/0x54
> >> [    5.464000]  [<(ptrval)>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x0/0x44
> >> [    5.464000]  [<(ptrval)>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xd6/0x128
> >> [    5.464000]  [<(ptrval)>] arch_local_irq_restore+0x0/0x2c
> >> [    5.464000]  [<(ptrval)>] __raw_spin_lock_init+0x0/0x1c
> >> [    5.464000]  [<(ptrval)>] pgd_alloc+0x10/0x24
> >
> > Does commit 73c348f31b63d28d ("sh: Fix unneeded constructor in page
> > table allocation") in next-20200710 and later fix that?
>
> Indeed, it does. This patch should be picked up as well.

It already has been picked up, as it is in linux-next.

> Kernel boots without any errors now.

Happy to hear that!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Reply via email to