Chao,
I can't find fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt() function. Do you
mean we need to implement this one for inline encryption?
2020년 7월 15일 (수) 오후 4:17, Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>님이 작성:
>
> On 2020/7/15 14:54, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> > You mean we can support ZEROOUT option only for encrypted files of
> > non-multidevice f2fs,
> > and return -EOPNOTSUPP in the multidevice case, right now?
>
> Yes, something like:
>
> f2fs_sec_trim_file()
>
> if ((range.flags & F2FS_TRIM_FILE_ZEROOUT) &&
> f2fs_encrypted_file() && f2fs_is_multi_device())
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
>
> f2fs_secure_erase()
>
> if (!ret && (flags & F2FS_TRIM_FILE_ZEROOUT)) {
> if (f2fs_encrypted_file()) {
> if (fscrypt_inode_uses_fs_layer_crypto)
> ret = fscrypt_zeroout_range();
> else
> ret = fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt();
> } else {
> ret = blkdev_issue_zeroout();
> }
> }
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > 2020년 7월 15일 (수) 오후 3:17, Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>님이 작성:
> >>
> >> On 2020/7/15 12:06, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> >>> We could use fscrypt_zeroout_range() for an encrypted file.
> >>> But, one problem is fscrypt_zeroout_range() assumes that filesystems
> >>> only use a single block device.
> >>> It means it doesn't receive bdev as a parameter.
> >>> How about changing the interface of fscrypt_zeroout_range() first and
> >>> using it?
> >>
> >> Yes, please limited to use fscrypt_zeroout_range() on non-multidevice f2fs
> >> image
> >> first, we can add a condition to check that in the beginning of ioctl
> >> interface,
> >> once fscrypt_zeroout_range() accepts bdev as parameter, we can remove that
> >> limitation.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>>
> >>> 2020년 7월 14일 (화) 오후 9:36, Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>님이 작성:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2020/7/14 2:11, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Daeho,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please take a look at this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git/commit/?h=dev&id=35245180459aebf6d70fde88a538f0400a794aa6
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm curious about what will happen if we call
> >>>> sec_trim_file(F2FS_TRIM_FILE_ZEROOUT) on an encrypted file, will
> >>>> it use zero bits covering encrypted data on disk?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 07/13, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> >>>>>> From: Daeho Jeong <daehoje...@google.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Changed the way of handling range.len of F2FS_IOC_SEC_TRIM_FILE.
> >>>>>> 1. Added -1 value support for range.len to secure trim the whole
> >>>>>> blocks
> >>>>>> starting from range.start regardless of i_size.
> >>>>>> 2. If the end of the range passes over the end of file, it means until
> >>>>>> the end of file (i_size).
> >>>>>> 3. ignored the case of that range.len is zero to prevent the function
> >>>>>> from making end_addr zero and triggering different behaviour of
> >>>>>> the function.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehoje...@google.com>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> Changes in v2:
> >>>>>> - Changed -1 range.len option to mean the whole blocks starting from
> >>>>>> range.start regardless of i_size
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> fs/f2fs/file.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >>>>>> index 368c80f8e2a1..2485841e3b2d 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >>>>>> @@ -3792,7 +3792,7 @@ static int f2fs_sec_trim_file(struct file *filp,
> >>>>>> unsigned long arg)
> >>>>>> pgoff_t index, pg_end;
> >>>>>> block_t prev_block = 0, len = 0;
> >>>>>> loff_t end_addr;
> >>>>>> - bool to_end;
> >>>>>> + bool to_end = false;
> >>>>>> int ret = 0;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
> >>>>>> @@ -3813,23 +3813,23 @@ static int f2fs_sec_trim_file(struct file
> >>>>>> *filp, unsigned long arg)
> >>>>>> file_start_write(filp);
> >>>>>> inode_lock(inode);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - if (f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode) || f2fs_compressed_file(inode)) {
> >>>>>> + if (f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode) || f2fs_compressed_file(inode) ||
> >>>>>> + range.start >= inode->i_size) {
> >>>>>> ret = -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> goto err;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - if (range.start >= inode->i_size) {
> >>>>>> - ret = -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> + if (range.len == 0)
> >>>>>> goto err;
> >>>>>> - }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - if (inode->i_size - range.start < range.len) {
> >>>>>> - ret = -E2BIG;
> >>>>>> - goto err;
> >>>>>> + if (inode->i_size - range.start > range.len) {
> >>>>>> + end_addr = range.start + range.len;
> >>>>>> + } else {
> >>>>>> + end_addr = range.len == (u64)-1 ?
> >>>>>> + sbi->sb->s_maxbytes : inode->i_size;
> >>>>>> + to_end = true;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> - end_addr = range.start + range.len;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - to_end = (end_addr == inode->i_size);
> >>>>>> if (!IS_ALIGNED(range.start, F2FS_BLKSIZE) ||
> >>>>>> (!to_end && !IS_ALIGNED(end_addr, F2FS_BLKSIZE)))
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>> ret = -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> @@ -3846,7 +3846,8 @@ static int f2fs_sec_trim_file(struct file *filp,
> >>>>>> unsigned long arg)
> >>>>>> down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]);
> >>>>>> down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, range.start, end_addr
> >>>>>> - 1);
> >>>>>> + ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, range.start,
> >>>>>> + to_end ? LLONG_MAX : end_addr - 1);
> >>>>>> if (ret)
> >>>>>> goto out;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> 2.27.0.383.g050319c2ae-goog
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> >>>>> linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> >>>>> .
> >>>>>
> >>> .
> >>>
> > .
> >
